MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7006768746

Why Are We Settling? Indigenous Cultural Safety Education for Counsellors in Ontario

2020· dissertation· en· W7006768746 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)IndigenousCultural humilityCurriculumCredibility
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indigenous cultural safety education is crucial to achieving greater health equity for Indigenous Peoples (Browne et al., 2016) by helping counsellors recognize the social, historical, political, and economic context of contemporary Indigenous wellness experiences (Ramsden, 2002). Accredited graduate programs in counselling psychology are the foundation of mental health support (Department of Health, 2015). In Canada, graduates apply for certified professional membership with the Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association and the ‘Registered Psychotherapist’ designation with the College of Registered Psychotherapists of Ontario (CRPO) to identify themselves as having met standards of professional practice. Counsellor education directly impacts professional practice and quality of support for Indigenous clients (Department of Health, 2015). The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015) report recognizes the need for cultural safety in recommendation 23(iii), which calls on all levels of government to provide “cultural competency training for all healthcare professionals.” This call is founded on evidence that client support tailored to a specific cultural context is more effective than generic client support (Griner & Smith, 2006; Allen et al., 2009; Gone, 2013). It is unknown if and to what extent counsellors trained in Ontario universities receive cultural safety education. Using Transformative Education Theory and a Reflexive Antiracism lens to understand the implementation and impact of cultural safety education in Ontario counselling professional programs, three studies were conducted: 1) An environmental scan of cultural safety education curricula across six Ontario university counselling programs; 2) Interviews with nine course instructors (one Indigenous) who teach counselling courses to examine course content, structure and delivery related to cultural safety education; and, 3) Interviews with 16 counselling students (one Indigenous) to discuss how their program experience impacts their ability to develop a culturally safe practice. Results indicate that Indigenous cultural safety education is only partially being incorporated as a core portion of counselling psychology curriculum in Ontario. Instructors took a fragmented approach to teaching about Indigenous wellness, leaving students with a fragmented understanding of how to develop a culturally safe practice. This suggests that Ontario counselling programs still have work to do in responding to Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s recommendation 23(iii).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→