До питання щодо зарубіжного досвіду формування і розвитку інституту звільнення від відбування покарання на прикладі Канади
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper reviewed the evolution of legislation on the release from (serving) punishment (Parole) in Canada, emphasizing the separate story of Canada Parole in the Common Law Family Countries. The key stages of the parole development, role of government institutions, essential features of the old and modern system of Parole in Canada described and systemized for further study. The key features of the Canadian Parole Laws identified. Preliminary comparative assessment of the areas of possible improvements of the Ukrainian release of punishment legal procedures to meet the best practice and humanitarian principals provided. The paper takes the approach from based on key aspects of Parole development in Canada: public safety; transparency and openness; fair rules. The certain core features of each aspects identified. The paper reads the consequent stages of the Parole development with a tendency to rehabilitation and correction focus rather than punitive. In a summary paper puts in place the preliminary recommendations on the streams of the further study towards development of the advanced models of the Parole in Ukraine. The possible options for the Parole legislation improving are listed. The Parole Board of Canada staffing also discussed and the merit base approach suggested. The primary focus is on the Parole decision-making procedures and respective rules, which should ensure the protection the offenders’, victim’s and public safety interest, maintaining the certain balance responding to public expectations and needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".