MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006903635

A Week Of Music And Dance\nAn Introduction

2000· article· en· W7006903635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceEntertainmentMusicalOperaGospelPopular musicSymbol (formal)Diversity (politics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the second week of April 1999, the Center for Great Plains Studies hosted The Great Plains Music & Dance Festival and Symposium. This undertaking, three years in the planning, co-chaired by Ron Bowlin and myself with suggestions of various committees of local advocates, resulted in a multidisciplinary event which showcased the diversity of our music and dance heritage in the Great Plains. Performances of Plains music and dance ranging from Northern and Southern Native Drums to Jazz, Folk, Gospel and Classical were featured at a variety of venues in Lincoln. This phase of the symposium culminated in a premier of a specially commissioned work celebrating the music of Charlie Parker, Chasing Bird, by Danny Grossman and his Toronto based modern dance company.\nIn addition to these diverse performances, the symposium consisted of twenty-nine scholarly presentations. The topics focused on music and dance in the geographical region of the Canadian and American Plains, and included demonstrations, panel discussions and papers, all subjected to peer review by our committees. Of the papers presented at the conference, four have been selected for this special symposium issue of the Great Plains Quarterly.\nIn "This Week At The Opera House: Popular Musical Entertainment At Great Plains Opera Houses, 1887-1917," Layne Ehlers discusses the importance of the Nebraska small town Opera House as a symbol of status and culture:\nOpera Houses represented a sense of "arrival" for communities which had begun only a few years before with wooden false fronts and a makeshift railroad depot. Starting out as converted second floor retail establishment, true ground floor theaters, for economic and aesthetic reasons became the norm by 1900.\nEhlers' research identified 125 extant theaters of which 26 had been nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. According to Ehlers, the name "Opera House" was something of a misnomer, as relatively few operas were presented in these theaters. Rather, dances, local entertainment and traveling troupes referred to as "combination companies" or "Lyceum Bureaus"-this referring to musical performances, lectures and specialty acts administered by local high schools or commercial booster clubs as fund raisers-provided the local programming. The heyday of the Opera Houses came to an end with the arrival of "Mr. Edison's moving pictures" and by the time of America's entry into World War I the brief history of the Opera Houses was over.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicAmerican Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207