Діяльність Гімнастичного товариства «Сокіл» в Польському Королівстві у 1905-1914 роках
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Traditions of “Sokół Movement” at the Polish lands come from 1867. At the time the first nest of Gymnastic Society “Sokół” had come into existence. In the Polish Kingdom and in the Polish territories ruled by Russia, first nests of Gymnastic Society “Sokół” emerged in 1905-1906.In the Polish Kingdom, “Sokół” nests were established among others in Częstochowa, Łódź, Piotrków Trybunalski, Radom, Warsaw and Dąbrowskie Zagłębie. The legalization of “Sokół” in the Polish Kingdom began May 30, 1906. The tsarist authorities recognized a “Sokół” status.The “Sokół” members in the Polish Kingdom strive for foundation of unitary “Sokół” organization according to the “Sokół” during Austrian nad Prussian partition as a pattern. On July 29, 1906 in Warsaw, the second meeting of the Polish Association of Gymnastic Societies’s founders took place. The association consisted of six districts: District of Czestochowa, Kalisz, Lubelskie, Łódz, Warsaw nad Dąbrowskie Zagłębie.The legal activity of “Sokół” in Polish Kingdom did not last long. The tsarist authorities suspended on September 2, 1906 legal activity of “Sokół” in the Polish Kingdom. “Sokół” moved to the underground activity till 1914. Gymnastic Society “Sokół” in the Polish Kingdom operated in the field of Physical Education, Cultural and Education, Independence and Publishing. In 1913 in the areas of Polish territories Ruled by Russia, 40 “Sokół” nests were operating. These nests were affiliated into 3 districts and concentrated 6 000 members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".