Модернізація профспілкової діяльності з позицій правозахисної функції профспілок: досвід зарубіжних країн
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article analyzes contemporary challenges and perspectives on the modernization of trade union activities through the integration of the human rights concept into their protective functions. The study examines how recent economic changes, characterized by the deregulation of labor relations, the spread of non-standard employment forms, and the privatization of social risks, have significantly weakened traditional mechanisms of worker protection. In this context, trade unions face the necessity to reconsider their roles and operational strategies, as classical instruments of collective bargaining and centralized regulation of labor relations have lost some of their effectiveness. The analysis is based on the international experience of countries with varying models of trade union organization, such as the United States, Great Britain, Germany, Scandinavian countries, and Canada. The article explores three primary models of trade union activity: representative, service-oriented, and organizing. The representative model involves delegating the protection of workers’ interests to professional union representatives through formal negotiation processes at enterprise and sectoral levels. The service-oriented model focuses on providing union members with diverse services, including legal protection and consultations, yet this model may foster passivity among workers. Conversely, the organizing model activates grassroots structures by engaging workers in self-organization and collective actions to defend their rights through mass campaigns and social movements. Additionally, the article emphasizes the importance of trade unions adapting to new employment forms, specifically engaging workers in the gig economy, migrant laborers, and other vulnerable groups traditionally excluded from union protections. Particular attention is devoted to successful examples of trade union modernization in the United States and Europe, where the organizing model has halted declines in union membership and enhanced the protection of labor rights. Thus, the article offers both theoretical and practical justification for transitioning trade unions from narrow forms of representation toward broader human rights organizations capable of effectively addressing contemporary socio-economic challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".