MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7007903137

Anxious Preoccupations: Unearthing the Affective Dimensions of Settler Anxiety in Canadian Literature

2024· dissertation· en· W7007903137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismIdentity (music)AnxietyCanadian literatureIndigenousNationalismRealmNational identityPower (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation proposes that settler anxiety is a founding feature of Canadian literature and its criticism. Combining twentieth-century theories of anxiety with contemporary theory from settler colonial studies, I test this proposition by locating settler anxiety within the literary nationalism of 1970s Canada, demonstrating that anxiety about unbelonging on Indigenous lands undergirds, but is simultaneously obfuscated by, Northrop Frye’s conception of the garrison mentality and Margaret Atwood’s survivor/victim paradigm in The Bush Garden: Essays on the Canadian Imagination (1971) and Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature (1972), respectively. Deploying relational approaches to questions of settler identity and belonging, I complicate Frye and Atwood’s containment of indigeneity within the realm of the symbolic by contextualizing their interventions alongside contemporaneous writing by sovereigntist activists George Manuel (Secwepemc) and Harold Cardinal (Cree). I then apply this critical rethinking to a close reading of settler anxiety in Margaret Laurence’s novel The Diviners (1974). The project argues for the necessity of returning to Frye and Atwood’s theories of Canadian identity because they have proven foundational to the development of Canadian literature as a field of study and its pedagogical engagement across secondary and postsecondary curricula, thereby registering significant impact that, I contend, reproduces the power dynamics of settler colonialism through Canadian literary studies. By returning to anxieties that undergird these theories, this dissertation rethinks settler affect both historically and in the present moment of supposed reconciliation to interrogate cultural processes that normalize settler attachments to colonial structures of power. In doing so, I endeavour to activate the settler anxieties of today in the direction of social justice and decolonial change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0160.014
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicShort Stories in Global Literature→French-language works237,207→