ApoE4 effects on the structural covariance brain networks topology in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Apolipoprotein E isoform E4 (ApoE4) is consistently associated with an elevated risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, little is known about his potential genetic modulation on the structural covariance brain networks during prodromal stages like Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The covariance phenomenon is based on the observation that regions correlating in morphometric descriptors are often part of the same brain system. In a first study, I assessed the ApoE4-related changes on the brain network topology in 256 MCI patients, using the regional cortical thickness to define the covariance network. The cross-sectional sample selected from the ADNI database was subdivided into ApoE4-positive (Carriers) and negative (non-Carriers). At the group-level, the results showed a significant decrease in characteristic path length, clustering index, local efficiency, global connectivity, modularity, and increased global efficiency for Carriers compared to non-Carriers. Overall, I found that ApoE4 in MCI shaped the topological organization of cortical thickness covariance networks. In the second project, I investigated the impact of ApoE4 on the single-subject gray matter networks in a sample of 200 MCI from the ADNI database. The patients were classified based on clinical outcome (stable MCI versus converters to AD) and ApoE4 status (Carriers versus non-Carriers). The effects of ApoE4 and disease progression on the network measures at baseline and rate of change were explored. The topological network attributes were correlated with AD biomarkers. The main findings showed that gray matter network topology is affected independently by ApoE4 and the disease progression (to AD) in late-MCI. The network measures alterations showed a more random organization in Carriers compared to non-Carriers. Finally, as additional research, I investigated whether a network-based approach combined with the graph theory is able to detect cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) changes in MCI. Our findings suggest that this experimental approach is more sensitive to identifying subtle cerebrovascular alterations than the classical experimental designs. This study paves the way for a future investigation on the ApoE4-cerebrovascular interaction effects on the brain networks during AD progression. In summary, my thesis results provide evidence of the value of the structural covariance brain network measures to capture subtle neurodegenerative changes associated with ApoE4 in MCI. Together with other biomarkers, these variables may help predict disease progression, providing additional reliable intermediate phenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".