Aleksitimi ve Psikolojik Belirtiler Arasındaki İlişkide Yaşantısal Kaçınma ve Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüklerinin Aracı Rolü
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the study, it was aimed to investigate the mediating role of experiential avoidance and emotional regulation difficulties in the relationship between alexithymia and psychological symptoms. In this context, necessary ethical permissions were obtained and data were collected from 424 students who received undergraduate education at Hacettepe University. While collecting the data, firstly the written consent of the students was obtained with the Informed Consent Form.” Then, students who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study filled the scale sets consisting of the Demographic Information Form, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-26, the Emotion Regulation Difficulties Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory. \nCorrelation analyzes were conducted to evaluate the relationships between the variables of alexithymia, experiential avoidance, emotion regulation difficulties and psychological symptoms, the relationships between the variables were found statistically significant. When the variables of alexithymia, experiential avoidance, emotion difficulties and psychological symptoms were evaluated in terms of gender variable, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of all main variables. However, in the Impulsivity subscale, which is the subscale of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and in the Somatization subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory subscale, women scored significantly more. Serial Multiple Mediator Analyzes was performed to examine the mediating roles of experiential avoidance and emotion regulation difficulties in the relationship between alexithymia and psychological symptoms. When the results are examined, it is seen that the variables of experiential avoidance and emotional regulation difficulties play mediating role together in this relationship. When these mediating variables are analyzed one by one, it was seen that emotion regulation difficulties has mediating role, but experiential avoidance does not have a mediating role. For this reason, additional analyzes have been made and, as in the literature, it has been observed that, for somatization and depression subscales, experiential avoidance plays a mediating role. All findings of the study were discussed in the light of the literature. The results, limitations and clinical implications of the study were explained and suggestions for new studies were given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".