Analysis of shock dynamics in supersonic intakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IoS index of startablity for one-dimensional flow.7, 9, 26-28 ISS international space station. 2 IVP initial value problem.89, 94, 117, 120, 121 LEO low earth orbit.2, 18 SoL shock on lip.7, 61 SRS strong reflected shock.26, 28, 30, 31 WRS weak reflected shock.26, 28, 30, 31, 179 ix • Rogério Pimentel set up the optics for the experiment.• Marco Boivin remedied the deficiencies in the model and made invaluable contributions to the mechanical aspects of the experiment.• Robert Bélanger carried out the instrumentation and collection of raw data for each experiment.xxii * The resulting geometry is carved out, usually based on a cardinal streamline, from a fully enclosed, symmetric, known internal flow (Figure 1.10).* See design point in the list of terms.† These results are included in Appendix A and Appendix B for completeness.* Used in the sense of unsteady, quasi-one-dimensional flow.† If bow shock is swallowed, steady state leads to Figure 1.3c.‡ If bow shock is regurgitated, steady-state leads to Figure 1.3a * See the note at the end of §I.9.1 on Page 225.† Also called the x-t plot, or just the wave diagram.‡ More precisely, these figures depict failure to start.Unstarting typically refers to a similar process and shock motion, except that the transition initially proceeds from a fully started flow state.* Three types of geometries belong exactly to this class: uniform sections with planar symmetry, wedge frustum with cylindrical symmetry, and a conical frustum with spherical symmetry. *In the fluid dynamics literature, common descriptions include: weak form, strong form, and various non-conservative forms (Appendix I).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".