Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen Ditinjau dari Harga dan \nKualitas Pelayanan di Goro Assalaam Pabelan Sukoharjo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the variables that influence customer \nsatisfaction. This study uses a quantitative approach. The data used in this study is the \nprimary data. Primary data sources in this study were obtained directly from the \nrespondents. Sample in this study is all consumers who come and buy something in \nGoro Assalaam Pabelan Sukoharjo store. Sampling technique used in this study is \nconvennience sampling by taking samples of 130 respondents. Data collection \nmethods used were field studies with personal questionnaire distribution. The \nanalysis used in this research is test instrument of research, test of classical \nassumption, multiple linear regression analysis test, t test, F test and coefficient of \ndetermination (R2). The results obtained from this study have several findings. Price \nhas positive affect to customer satisfaction. Quality of service has positive affect to \ncustomer satisfaction. Simultaneously Price and Quality of service have significant \neffect on customer satisfaction with contribution given (Adjusted R2) equal to 30,2% \nand the rest 69,8% influenced by other variable not included in this research model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".