MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008160863

Beans for Healthy Aging: An Exploration of Factors Related to Bean Consumption in Older Adults and An Examination of the Effects of Canned Beans of Multiple Varieties in Different Daily Amounts on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Biomarkers in Adults with Elevated LDL Cholesterol

2021· dissertation· en· W7008160863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Healthy agingLegumeDiseaseLipid profileOlder peopleHealth benefits
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in Canada and the United States and with rapidly aging populations, strategies promoting consumption of nutrient-dense foods to improve modifiable risk factors for CVD are needed. Beans are a candidate food for healthy aging since they are nutrient-dense and are associated with reduced CVD risk through their ability to reduce total and LDL cholesterol. However, studies focused on bean consumption in older adults and on the effects of multiple bean varieties in different daily amounts on lipid profile are lacking. Therefore, this research addressed these gaps with three objectives: (1) to determine the prevalence of bean consumption and identify motivators, barriers, and other factors related to bean consumption among older adults, (2) to determine the awareness and knowledge of the nutritional and health attributes of beans among older adults, and (3) to determine the effects of canned beans of multiple varieties in different daily amounts on fasting serum lipid profile in adults with elevated LDL cholesterol. Objectives #1 and #2 were addressed using a mixed-methods approach including a researcher-administered questionnaire (n=250) followed by focus groups (n=49). Objective #1 results showed that 51.2% of older adult (65 years) participants were bean consumers who were significantly more likely to indicate motivators to their bean consumption compared to bean non-consumers. Conversely, bean non-consumers were significantly more likely than bean consumers to indicate barriers to their bean consumption. Objective #2 results showed that most (99.2%) older adult participants considered beans a healthy food. However, gaps exist in participant’s awareness of the nutritional and health attributes of beans. Finally, objective #3 was addressed using a multi-centre, randomized, crossover clinical trial in adults with elevated LDL cholesterol. Participants consumed 1 cup beans (1CB; n=66), ½ cup beans (½CB; n=68) and 1 cup white rice (WR; n=64) for 4 weeks each separated by ≥4-week washout periods. Total and LDL cholesterol were significantly lower for 1CB but not ½CB compared to WR. Collectively, these studies provide evidence that can inform practical dietary strategies to increase bean consumption thereby reducing CVD risk and contributing to healthy aging in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicFood composition and properties→French-language works237,207→