MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008179532

A atuação do IFES no interior do Espírito Santo : uma análise comparativa com base no ENEM

2017· dissertation· pt· W7008179532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase (topology)Work (physics)PretextContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to point out the importance of the expansion of the Rede Federal to the interior of the state of Espirito Santo, in terms of educational development of students from cities away from Greater Vitoria, based on an analysis of the performance of four Campuses of the Federal Institute of Espirito Santo - Aracruz, Cachoeiro de Itapemirim, Nova Venecia and Piuma - in the Brazilian National High School Examination (ENEM), in the years 2014 and 2015. The ENEM was the metric adopted for analysis because other comparative analysis tools such as the Human Development Index (HDI) and the Economic Well-Being Index (IEWB), which could be used to support an analysis of this nature, do not have annual updates in Brazil, the first being based on the Census developed by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and the second a tool developed in Canada and that, although its application was defended as a substitute for the use of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) as a measure of Wealth of a country, does not have wide acceptance like the last. The aim of this study was to verify how the IFES Campi perform in the ENEM in comparison with the other educational institutions of their respective municipalities, besides comparing the performance of the Campi with the public schools of their municipality and between themselves. The proposed methodology is an exploratory study, with a qualitative and quantitative approach of a descriptive nature. The data collected from primary source will be through interviews with managers of the Campi researched, and the secondary data from documental and bibliographic research. The results obtained from secondary sources showed that there was a decrease in the performance of all Campi in the year 2015, when there was also budgetary contingency in the units, which indicates a correlation between performance and investments made. The analysis of the data aims on the Gibbs approach, which proposes the categorization of the data from a comparative analysis, in which the content of the interviews generates tables of information to demonstrate the vision of the speakers about the Federal Institute of Education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicEducation and Public PolicyFrench-language works237,207