MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008204217

Apple's iOS 9 release planned this week

2015· other· en· W7008204217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile deviceHuman multitaskingPaymentMeaning (existential)MAGIC (telescope)Newspaper
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apple's next version of the operating system for iPhones and iPads rolls out Wednesday. Techradar points out some of the new features you'll be seeing in this update. Siri is said to be 40 percent faster in this release...and 40 percent more accurate. IOS9'll work on older devices as well, meaning the iPhone 4S and iPad 2. Apple's doing a name-change where Apple Pay lives. Passport's renamed Wallet. Apple Pay's now backed by 2500 banks in the US. Canada and China're still waiting for the mobile payment system. Another change-over is Newsstand. The app's being replaced with News, a magazine-style news aggregator -- meaning it's like Flipboard. Apple Map's getting its first major refresh in two years. It now includes public transit directions. A big change on iPad with IOS9 is true multitasking - at least for the newer models. Split View lets two apps appear side-by-side and both're active at the same time. IOS9 also features Wi-Fi Assist. So, when you're Wi-Fi connection's dropping, the device'll automatically jump over to your mobile network. It also has a new Low Power mode, working some magic to give you an extra hour of battery time. And IOS9 won't be the hog IOS8 was to install. You'll need only 1.3 GB of space instead of 4½ GB last time around. Despite all these new features, it's often good to wait a few days after the release to see if any speed bumps happen when everyone else tests it out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.233

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)French-language works237,207