MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008263475

Automated vision-based part localization and path generation in robotic fiberglass trimming

2023· dissertation· en· W7008263475 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrimmingAutomationPoint cloudProcess (computing)Cloud computingRANSACPath (computing)Adaptability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiberglass composites play a vital role in the manufacturing of heavy vehicles due to their exceptional corrosion resistance and lightweight characteristics. As part of the manufacturing process, trimming operations are performed after injection molding to achieve the desired final shape of the parts. The current practice, i.e. manual trimming, is inefficient, poses safety risks, and lacks consistency, presenting an ideal opportunity to introduce automation in the manufacturing cycle. However, conventional robotic automation solutions, which rely on process repeatability, are not a feasible option due to the high level of variations in fiberglass trimming arising from the high mix of parts and frequent design updates. To overcome these challenges, this thesis presents a vision-based framework for autonomous trimming of fiberglass parts, eliminating the need for part-specific fixtures and extensive manual reprogramming of industrial robots. By leveraging advanced 3D vision technologies, the proposed framework enables autonomous trimming operations while ensuring efficiency and adaptability in the manufacturing process. Initially, we begin by accurately determining the precise location of various parts. This is achieved by utilizing a reference CAD model and point cloud data obtained from actual parts. We explore different environmental and sensor configurations for 3D imaging to determine the optimal approach for capturing point cloud data from multiple viewpoints, thus ensuring an accurate representation of the real part. Subsequently, we delve into the examination of various techniques, including ICP (Iterative Closest Point), RANSAC (Random Sample Consensus), and deep learning methods, with the aim of automating the part localization process. We evaluate these methods to determine which one is most effective in achieving accurate part localization within the robot cell. Once we have successfully localized the part within the robot cell, our next step involves generating robot paths based on the CAD model. Our approach involves extracting trim line information from the CAD models and employing a series of kinematic transformations to map the path onto the real part located inside the robot cell. Additionally, we propose an alternative method wherein the path can be generated based on visible templates present on the part itself rather than relying solely on CAD models. Finally, we present a last layer of error compensation using an on-board vision system to eliminate any remaining errors from the previous steps. Our experimental findings demonstrate the applicability of deep learning-based techniques for point cloud registration in facilitating robust part localization. Moreover, we illustrate that the integration of our error compensation systems yields a substantial enhancement in the precision of trimming path tracking. By employing these techniques, we aim to streamline and automate the process of part localization and path generation, enabling efficient and accurate operations within the robot cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207