MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008440323

Catalogue of International and Regional Legal Standards:Refugee and Human Rights Law Standards Applicable to Asylum Governance

2021· article· en· W7008440323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsHuman rightsInternational human rights lawCorporate governanceInternational lawRefugee law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

adopted the broad definition of refugee of the Cartagena Declaration, by extending refugee status to people fleeing situations of 'severe and generalized violation of human rights '.20 Canada acceded to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (hereinafter jointly referred to as the 1951 Convention) in 1969.It maintains reservations to articles 23 and 24 of the 1951 Convention by interpreting "lawfully staying" as referring only to refugees admitted for permanent residence.Canada is party to several core International human rights instruments, including the ICCPR and its two optional protocols, and ICESCR.Canada is also party to the CAT and to the CERD.Canada has not ratified the CAT Optional Protocol establishing a monitoring system to prevent violations of the Convention by state parties and the ICESCR Optional Protocol on a complaints procedure.Canada is not party to the CMW and the 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons.As a member of the Organisation of American States (OAS), Canada is also party of the inter-American human rights system.Canada is under an obligation to respect human rights as provided in the OAS Charter as well as in the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man.Canada recognises the functions of the inter-American Commission on human rights, including its competence to formulate recommendations to member states and receive and process individual petitions.However, Canada as not ratified the American Convention on Human Rights and has thus not recognized the jurisdiction of the inter-American Court of Human Rights.This also implies that the inter-American Commission cannot refer to the Court cases regarding Canada.21 Jordan is not party to the Refugee Convention nor its 1967 Protocol, but is party to the ICCPR) and ICESCR.However, Jordan has ratified neither the ICCPR first optional protocol establishing a communication procedure nor the ICCPR second optional protocol on the abolition of the death penalty.Jordan is also not party to the ICESCR optional protocol allowing for individual communications.Jordan is party to several other core UN human rights instruments, including the CAT and the CERD.Jordan also ratified CEDAW, but not its optional protocol on a communications procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.018
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0100.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Refugees, and Integration→French-language works237,207→