MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008458896

China’s unfolding Arctic strategy : threatening or opportunistic?

2019· other· en· W7008458896 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleGovernment of Canada
KeywordsArcticChinaPoliticsSpeculationClimate changeThe arcticSovereigntyNatural resource
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid climatic changes in the Arctic—the fast melting of permafrost, the decline of glaciers, \nthe melting of sea ice—have created perceived strategic and economic opportunities for the littoral \nstates, but have also attracted the attention of states beyond the region. China, for example, without \ndirect access to the Arctic, displays an interest in Arctic research, natural resources, and shipping \npotential. However, its diplomatic, economic, political and scientific efforts in this region arouse \nnegative reactions among Western media. The media often draw up a portrait of an ambitious and \narrogant China, ready to push aside the sovereignty of the Arctic countries to defend Chinese interests in the Arctic. From this perspective, it seems relevant to analyse China’s activities in the region \nand try to assess Beijing’s strategy in the Arctic, which seems more driven by opportunism than by \na long-term desire to challenge the littoral states’ sovereignty. \nThe commercial and strategic implications of climate change and the melting of the sea ice \nin the Arctic have drawn attention not only of Arctic states but also of some other countries that \nhave no territorial access to the region, such as China and Japan. The growing Chinese interest in \nthe Arctic appears to be a rather recent phenomenon.1 \n There have been many publications and \nconsiderable speculation on that topic, resulting in the construction of an image of a potentially \nthreatening China, which is often described as being very interested in both Arctic mineral resources and the opening of Arctic shipping routes. In addition, China increasingly describes itself as a \n“near-Arctic” [ ]state,2 \n as if attempting to legitimize its growing interest in the region. But \nin this characterization, there is a hint of a perceived threat, as commentators are often stressing that \nChina’s appetite may lead Beijing into considering the Northwest Passage as an international strait, \nand Arctic resources as up for grabs. Thus, the intensified interest of the world community towards \nthe Arctic and towards China’s growing presence in this region have raised several questions. What \ndoes China’s interest in the Arctic denote regarding its long-term goals? What is the scale of China’s \npolar research and collaboration? What is the official position of the Chinese government towards \nthe Arctic? What strategy has Beijing developed regarding Arctic issues—of sovereignty of Arctic \nstates, the exploitation of natural resources, and the development of new navigation passages? In \nfact, after lengthy speculations, China eventually published its Arctic policy in January 2018,3 \n but \ndoes not wish to, nor does it represent a threat to claims put forward by Arctic coastal states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)→French-language works237,207→