MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008517782

The Challenge (Goldcorp Inc.): prospección aurífera
\nvía Internet. Aplicación del modelo de zona
\nde cizalla aurífera a la mina Red Lake (Ontario, Canadá)

2004· article· es· W7008517782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary Open Repository (Universidad Complutense Madrid) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoldcorp
KeywordsWeb siteContext (archaeology)Work (physics)CONTEST
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En marzo del 2000 la compañía canadiense Goldcorp Inc. invitó a geólogos de todo el mundo a presentar propuestas de exploración para
\nsu propiedad minera en Ontario (Red Lake mine). El concurso fue denominado “The Challenge”. Las propuestas tenían que: ser concisas,
\nidentificar objetivos específicos, estar sustentadas por un razonamiento geológico apropiado, y ser enviadas vía e-mail en inglés. Las propuestas
\npodían ser presentadas por individuos o equipos. La información geológica sobre la propiedad minera se hizo disponible en formato
\ndigital (CD-ROM), y fue suplementada con información adicional en la página web habilitada por la compañía a tal efecto
\n(http://www.goldcorpchallenge.com/challenge. homepage_static.html). Un equipo de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid formado por
\nun profesor y alumnos de una asignatura del programa de doctorado se registró en The Challenge (junto con otros 1400 participantes), y
\nla propuesta de exploración que elaboraron consiguió uno de los premios de semifinalistas. En este trabajo se muestra el desarrollo de
\ndicha propuesta. Esta estuvo basada en la aplicación del modelo de zona de cizalla aurífera a una mineralización compleja bajo el punto
\nde vista tectónico y metamórfico, emplazada en un cinturón de rocas verdes del Arqueozoico.
\n[ABSTRACT]
\nIn March 2000 Goldcorp Inc. invited contestants from all over the world to submit exploration proposals for its Red Lake Mine Property.
\nThe contest was named The Challenge. Each Proposal had to be: concise, identify specific targets, be supported by appropriate geological
\nreasoning, and be submitted by e-mail in the English language. Proposals could be submitted by individuals or by teams. Geological
\ninformation about the Property was available by CD-Rom and supplemented with additional information on the web site (http://www.goldcorpchallenge.
\ncom/challenge.homepage_static.html). A team from the University of Madrid (U. Complutense; a lecturer and a group of
\nPhD. students) registered in The Challenge (among 1400 on-line prospectors), and the proposal was awarded one of the semifinalist prizes.
\nIn this paper we show the proposal, which was based on the application of the gold shear zone model to a mineralization hosted by
\na highly deformed sequence belonging to a greenstone belt of Archaean age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0090.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it