MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008635838

Communication as a Factor for Uptake of Intraorganizational Accessibility and Inclusivity Initiatives

2023· article· en· W7008635838 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Thematic analysisWork (physics)Qualitative propertyOrganizational communicationQualitative researchSurvey data collection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of the more than 6.2 million Canadians living with a disability, many find gaining access to inclusive sport, exercise, and physical activity challenging. The Leading Equitable Accessible Delivery (LEADTM) is a self-assessment tool designed to support the implementation of accessible and inclusive changes within sport, exercise, and physical activity organizations. Communication (e.g., methods and channels) plays an important role in the successful implementation of organizational initiatives. However, little is known about how communication influences LEAD implementation. This study aimed to examine communication as a factor influencing the uptake of new accessibility and inclusivity initiatives within sport organizations and understand how communication within organizations' networks facilitates or hinders the implementation of the LEAD. Organizations (n=2) which have finished the LEAD were recruited to complete a network survey with quantitative and qualitative items. The survey captured organizational networks comprised of individuals who work within the sport organizations at various leadership levels. Quantitative data were investigated using a social network analysis. Qualitative data was subjected to inductive thematic analysis then mapped onto the network to provide insight into how communication within organizations influences the sharing of accessibility and inclusion information. Network results demonstrated mutually beneficial communication across both general staff and leadership staff, indicating strong communication and ties to three general themes: organizational culture, organizational resources, and organizational support. Understanding how ideal communication efforts within organizations influences uptake of accessibility and inclusion initiatives, namely the LEAD, will provide future guidance and improvements to accessibility efforts within sport, exercise, and physical activity realms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.084
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.084
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207