MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008731371

Conflicts over an emerging creative space. A cultural quarter development in Belgrade

2014· article· en· W7008731371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty of Geography (University of Belgrade) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)CreativityCorporate governanceCreative cityCreative CitiesCreative industries
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In post-transitional city developments in Central and Eastern Europe, the trend of increasing importance attached to artists and other stakeholders in the creative sector has come with delay. Particular in Serbia this delay is even more pronounced, because of the complex situation in the country at the turn of the 20th and the 21st century (civil war, isolation, late political transition, etc.). Whereas the rise of creative milieus and the increasing role of artists in shaping of city quarters became a widespread and well-known trend in Western cities, Southeastern European cities for a long time did not elaborate any strategies focused on involving artists in contemporary urban developments. Thus, development of city quarters aimed at strengthening creativity and creative businesses is a new phenomenon in the urban centres in this part of Europe. On the one hand, these spaces are shaped by creative dynamics and the inspiration of artists and, on the other, by governance mechanisms. Our research is focused on the quarter of Savamala in Belgrade. In the case of this emerging "cool place" various stakeholders (policy makers, non-governmental organizations, artists, residents and entrepreneurs) are in use conflicts when it comes to the development or planning of this part of the city. Through interviews with stakeholders we will identify conflict lines and conflict areas in this specific case, as well as analyze the governance mechanisms which shape the appearance of the quarter. We aim to get a clear story about particular strategies and dynamics which lay behind the transformation of the area. We are reconsidering the development initiatives and the public image of Savamala as a quarter of creativity, and we are questioning if these changes in urban space are mainly connected to artists’ involvement. We also seek to question the future development possibilities taking into account the various stakeholders involved, their interests, and power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty of Geography (University of Belgrade)Same topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207