Bibliographic record
Abstract
This policy concerning College Admission is established in accordance with the College Education Regulations (CQLR, chapter C-29, r. 4) (Règlement sur le régime des études collégiales (RREC)).Dawson College is fully committed to the Quebec public colleges' mission to facilitate accessibility to College education for all students abiding by the articles of the following policy. Objective of the PolicyThe objective of this policy is to ensure transparency, equity and coherence in the admission process. Scope of the PolicyThis Policy applies to all candidates applying to Dawson College for:• Programs leading to a Diploma of College Studies (DCS/DEC) Springboard to a DCS (DEC) programs (Transition)• Programs leading to an Attestation of College Studies (AEC) College Education RegulationsThe Regulations define admission criteria to be met by students in order to be admitted to a CEGEP.Dawson College admits applicants based on the general and specific conditions of Articles 2, 3, and 4 of the Regulations. Program Prerequisites Specific course prerequisites for a program are defined by the Quebec Ministry of Education in an annual document entitled 'Conditions d'admission aux programmes d'études conduisant au diplôme d'études collégiales'. ApplicationsApplications for admission must be submitted by the deadlines stated on the Dawson website, accompanied by all required documents and fees.The deliberate withholding of information or an incomplete application may result in a refusal.All applicants' files shall be reviewed and evaluated for admission to the College by the College Admissions Office.Each candidate will receive a formal written response explaining the admission decision regarding their application for admission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.356 | 0.263 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".