MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008925451

Compositional Matrix-Space Models: Learning Methods and Evaluation

2020· other· en· W7008925451 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTechnische Universität DarmstadtAtomic Energy of Canada LimitedMcGill UniversityInstituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)Property (philosophy)Meaning (existential)NasalizationFeature (linguistics)Word (group theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been a lot of research on machine-readable representations of words for natural language processing (NLP). One mainstream paradigm for the word meaning representation comprises vector-space models obtained from the distributional information of words in the text. Machine learning techniques have been proposed to produce such word representations for computational linguistic tasks. Moreover, the representation of multi-word structures, such as phrases, in vector space can arguably be achieved by composing the distributional representation of the constituent words. To this end, mathematical operations have been introduced as composition methods in vector space. An alternative approach to word representation and semantic compositionality in natural language has been compositional matrix-space models. In this thesis, two research directions are considered. In the first, considering compositional matrix-space models, we explore word meaning representations and semantic composition of multi-word structures in matrix space. The main motivation for working on these models is that they have shown superiority over vector-space models regarding several properties. The most important property is that the composition operation in matrix-space models can be defined as standard matrix multiplication; in contrast to common vector space composition operations, this is sensitive to word order in language. We design and develop machine learning techniques that induce continuous and numeric representations of natural language in matrix space. The main goal in introducing representation models is enabling NLP systems to understand natural language to solve multiple related tasks. Therefore, first, different supervised machine learning approaches to train word meaning representations and capture the compositionality of multi-word structures using the matrix multiplication of words are proposed. The performance of matrix representation models learned by machine learning techniques is investigated in solving two NLP tasks, namely, sentiment analysis and compositionality detection. Then, learning techniques for learning matrix-space models are proposed that introduce generic task-agnostic representation models, also called word matrix embeddings. In these techniques, word matrices are trained using the distributional information of words in a given text corpus. We show the effectiveness of these models in the compositional representation of multi-word structures in natural language. The second research direction in this thesis explores effective approaches for evaluating the capability of semantic composition methods in capturing the meaning representation of compositional multi-word structures, such as phrases. A common evaluation approach is examining the ability of the methods in capturing the semantic relatedness between linguistic units. The underlying assumption is that the more accurately a method of semantic composition can determine the representation of a phrase, the more accurately it can determine the relatedness of that phrase with other phrases. To apply the semantic relatedness approach, gold standard datasets have been introduced. In this thesis, we identify the limitations of the existing datasets and develop a new gold standard semantic relatedness dataset, which addresses the issues of the existing datasets. The proposed dataset allows us to evaluate meaning composition in vector- and matrix-space models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden)Same topicSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFrench-language works237,207