MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009083885

Direito indigenista nas constituições de Brasil e Canadá: um estudo comparado

2017· article· pt· W7009083885 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da Faculdade de Direito (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Field (mathematics)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo é resultado de uma análise comparada da história, das organizações sociais e dos ordenamentos jurídicos indigenistas de Brasil e Canadá.O estudo foi feito a partir de artigos científicos, livros e a legislação indigenista dos dois países.O objetivo deste estudo comparado é mostrar os resultados da colonização nas culturas e no modo de vida dos povos indígenas e como as Constituições e demais legislações abordaram a proteção aos índios.A chegada dos europeus nos dois países foi negativa aos nativos, trouxe doenças, exploração e dizimação.Os colonizadores desestruturaram as organizações sociais desses povos e tentaram lhes impor suas culturas e leis.Como fruto da resistência a assimilação e da luta pela autonomia, os indígenas conquistaram direitos fundamentais dentro de uma sociedade em que a maioria, tem preconceito contra as minorias.Desde a colonização até os dias atuais, este trabalho abordará como se deu a formação das políticas e legislações indigenistas de Brasil e Canadá.This article is the result of a comparative analysis of the history, social organizations and indigenous legal systems of Canada and Brazil.The study had been done from scientific articles, books and the indigenous legislation of both countries.The aim of this comparative study is to show the results of colonization on cultures and life style of indigenous peoples and how the Constitutions and other legislations brought the Indians' protection.The arrival of Europeans in both countries was negative to the natives, brought diseases, exploitation and decimation.The settlers de-structured social organizations of these people and tried to impose them their cultures and laws.As a result of resistance to assimilation and the struggle for autonomy, indigenous conquered fundamental rights within a society where the majority is prejudiced against minorities.From colonization to the present day, this work will show how the indigenous legislation and policies formation in Brazil and Canada was.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevista da Faculdade de Direito (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)Same topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207