¿Disidencia dentro del feminismo?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the dissident thought within the feminist movement. This new approach dissents from some main epistemological assumptions of the feminism, and claims against its effects, both in the academy and the public agenda. On the one hand, the authors that have leaded the critique against the so-called “gender ideology”, have the support of most of the American public. On the other hand, they are experiencing the wrath of the academic feminist and the accusation of being part of a backlash. The charges are conservatism, betrayal, and anti-feminism harassment. The social tension has increase with the date rape crisis, the new feminism cause, besides the current politics against pornography and sexual harassment. Furthermore dissident voices in Canada, France and Spain prove a serious break up in one of the most important social movements in the last decades. En este trabajo se examina una nueva corriente de pensamiento surgida dentro del movimiento feminista norteamericano, que disiente de algunos de los principales presupuestos epistemológicos del feminismo, y que denuncia sus efectos, tanto en la población americana, en especial dentro de la comunidad académica, como en la agenda pública. Las autoras que han emprendido la crítica de la denominada “ideología del género” cuentan por un lado con el apoyo de una gran parte del público americano. Por otra parte, han suscitado la ira del feminismo académico que les atribuye ser parte de un backlash (un contraataque) frente a los logros conseguidos por el feminismo. Son acusadas, entre otras cosas, de conservadurismo, traición a la causa feminista o acoso institucional antifeminista. El grado de crispación se ha elevado con la crisis de “las violaciones en las citas” que se ha convertido en la nueva causa feminista, junto con las actuales políticas contra la pornografía y el acoso sexual. A todo esto, se añade el surgimiento de voces disidentes en Canadá, Francia y España, que confirman una grave fractura dentro de uno de los movimientos sociales más importantes de las últimas décadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".