Edirneli Eskicizâde Ali Efendi’nin Şerhu’l-Emsile adlı eseri (inceleme ve tahkik)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ÖZET \n \n EDİRNELİ ESKİCİZÂDE ALİ EFENDİ’NİN ŞERHU’L-EMSİLE ADLI ESERİ \n (İNCELEME ve TAHKİK) \n \nBu çalışmada XVIII. yüzyılın sonu ile XIX. yüzyılın ilk çeyreğine tekabül eden zaman diliminde yaşamış olan Osmanlı müelliflerinden Edirneli Eskicizâde Ali Mehdi Efendi (ö. 1243/1828) ve onun Şerhu’l-Emsile isimli eseri konu edilmiştir. Üç bölümden oluşan çalışmanın ilk bölümünde, sarf ilminin ortaya çıkışı, tarihi gelişimi ve el-Emsile adlı eser ele alınmıştır. İkinci bölümde müellifin hayatı ve eserleri hakkında bilgi verildikten sonra eser tanıtılarak tahkikte takip edilen usûl, müellifin üslubu, eserin öne çıkan özellikleri, ilmi değeri, muhtevası ele alınarak eserin kısaca değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Üçüncü bölümde ise eserin tahkikli metnine yer verilmiştir. Bu çalışmayla Osmanlı döneminde kaleme alınan eserlerden birini gün yüzüne çıkararak, müellifin dil alanında yaptığı katkıları ortaya koymak ve Arap diline mütevazi bir katkıda bulunmak hedeflenmiştir. \n \n \n-------------------- \nABSTRACT \n SHARH al-AMSILA THE WORK OF ESKİCİZÂDE ALİ EFENDİ FROM EDİRNE \n (ANALYSİS AND CRİTİCAL EDİTİON) \nIn this study the Ottoman author Eskicizâde Ali Efendi from Edirne (time of death 1243/1828) who lived in the period that corresponds to the final of the XVIII. century and the first quarter of the XIX. century and his work titled as Sharh al-Amsıla are entreated. The work consists of three parts; in the first part historical developments, emergence of drainage science and the work of al-Amsila handlend. In the second part, after giving information about the life and works of Eskicizâde, the work was introduced and a brief review of the work was done by taking into consideration the method followed in the investigation, authour’s style, prominent characteristics of the work, scientific value and its content. In the third part, the text of the work is examined by critical edition. In this study, it is aimed to reveal one of the works written in the Ottoman period to put forward the author’s contributions in the field of language and to make a modest contribution to the Arabic language .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it