DIMENSIONES DE LA PERSONALIDAD Y TIPOS DE ALEXITIMIA EN ADOLESCENTES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente investigaci?n busca la relaci?n entre las dimensiones de la personalidad \nseg?n Eysenck y presencia de alexitimia en adolescentes de Instituciones Educativas \nPrivadas y P?blicas de UGEL ? SUR Arequipa; con la finalidad de comprobar si existe \nla presencia de alexitimia en adolescentes con dimensi?n de la personalidad \nintrovertida. Nuestra investigaci?n es de tipo correlacional y de corte transversal. \nPara la evaluaci?n de dicha relaci?n entre alexitimia y personalidad extrovertida e \nintrovertida se us? dos pruebas: el Inventario de Personalidad EPQ - Forma A (Hans J. \nEysenck - Sybul B.G Eysenck) y la Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto TAS 20 (Bagby, \nTaylor y Parker, 1985. Adaptaci?n de Mart?nez ? S?nchez (1996)); a modo de \ncomprobar la comprensi?n se aplic? una prueba piloto a 17 adolescentes. \nAdicionalmente para el an?lisis de datos se emple? la hoja de c?lculo de Excel 2013 con \nsu complemento anal?tico y el paquete SPSS v.22.0. \nDe esta manera se pudo concluir que existe una relaci?n inversa significativa entre la \npersonalidad y la alexitimia en adolescentes de UGEL ? SUR Arequipa; la personalidad \nintrovertida se relaciona con una alta alexitimia, predomina en varones y mujeres la \npersonalidad extrovertida, y las mujeres tienden a tener mayor alexitimia que los \nvarones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it