MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009314309

Dynamics of the spherical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model and average case complexity for top eigenvectors

2023· dissertation· en· W7009314309 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsLimit (mathematics)LimitingInverseLangevin dynamicsFunction (biology)Constant (computer programming)Upper and lower bounds
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Master’s thesis, we investigate the Langevin dynamics on the spherical Sherrington-
\nKirkpatrick (SSK) model, a classical mean-field spin glass model. The first contribution
\nof this thesis is the asymptotic limit of energy function of the SSK model, a critical property
\nlinked to the model’s equilibrium state. The thermodynamic limit of energy of the
\nsystem is characterized in terms of a system of integro-differential equations as the size of
\nthe system goes to infinity. Then we look at the behavior of the limiting dynamics as the
\ntime goes to infinity. This long time behavior of the energy has a phase transition. In the
\nregime of below the critical inverse temperature, the limiting result is zero. In the regime
\nof above the critical inverse temperature, the limiting result is a constant depending on
\nthe temperature.
\n
\nThe second contribution of this thesis is that we analyze the complexity of the zerotemperature
\nLangevin dynamics (a.k.a. the gradient descent algorithm) on the SSK model.
\nWe establish lower and upper bound for the hitting time, defined as the first time required
\nfor the output of the algorithm to achieve a small overlap with the eigenvector corresponding
\nto the smallest eigenvalue of the Wigner matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsFrench-language works237,207