The early experiences of a governing board in Quebec /
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 1998, school governing boards have been Quebec's answer to the trend towards school-based management.This study investigates the experiences oftwo parent representatives on a school governing board and a school board administrator in the early years of Quebec's effort to decentralize educational governance.The literature suggests that school-based management can be found in various degrees, but that it is not always successfully implemented.Obstacles related to school-based management include how school governing boards are composed, how their powers are defined, and the nature of their relationsmp with their school boards.Evidence from the three participants suggests that these obstacles may threaten the credibility of school governing boards.The study concludes with recommendations for improving the effectiveness of school governing boards in Quebec. ABREGEDepuis 1998, les conseils d'tablissements(CE) des coles du Qubec sont devenus la rponse a la tendance vers l'autonomie locale des coles.Le document qui suit fait tat de l'expriences de deux parents membres du CE d'une cole et d'un administrateur au niveau de la commission scolaire au tout dbut des efforts dploys par le gouvernement du Qubec pour dcentraliser le pouvoir en ducation.Les tudes soulignent que le pouvoir dcisionnel local peut tre retrouve a divers degrs, mais que l'implantation n'est pas toujours russie.Certains obstacles relies a l'implantation d'une politique administrative locale proviennent de la composition du CE, de la dfinition de leurs pouvoirs et de la nature des rapports qu'ils entretiennent avec leurs commissions scolaires.Les tmoignage des trois participants soulvent que ces obstacles peuvent nuire
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".