MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009366319

Effect of induced acute metabolic alkalosis by sodium bicarbonate administration on exercise ventilatory efficiency in healthy adults

2016· dissertation· en· W7009366319 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolic alkalosisPlaceboSodium bicarbonatepCO2Crossover studyBicarbonateAlkalosisVenous blood
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of 18 healthy adults aged 22.2 ± 0.5 yrs (mean ± SE), we tested the hypothesis that increasing the arterial PCO2 equilibrium point via induced acute metabolic alkalosis by sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, 0.3 g/kg) administration would decrease the ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (V̇E-V̇CO2) at its lowest point ("nadir") during high-intensity constant-load cycle exercise testing, reflecting improved exercise ventilatory efficiency. Compared to the NaCl control condition, administration of NaHCO3: increased arterialized venous pH, HCO3- and PCO2 at rest by 0.05 ± 0.01 units, 4.3 ± 0.7 mmHg and 6.4 ± 0.4 meq/L, respectively (all p<0.0001); decreased the V̇E/V̇CO2 nadir by 9.4% (p<0.0001) secondary to reduced V̇E (by 4.7 ± 1.8 L/min, p=0.019); had no effect on cardiometabolic and symptom responses to exercise; and did not improve exercise tolerance. In conclusion, induced acute metabolic alkalosis by NaHCO3 administration improved exercise ventilatory efficiency in healthy adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicRenal function and acid-base balanceFrench-language works237,207