MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009646353

Explore the In-context Learning Capability of Large Language Models

2024· dissertation· en· W7009646353 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Context (archaeology)Embodied cognitionDomain (mathematical analysis)Software deploymentNatural language understandingNatural language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has marked the beginning of a new age in AI capabilities, particularly in the domain of natural language understanding and processing. Among the forefront of these advancements is the exploration of in-context learning, a paradigm that enables models to adapt to new tasks without explicit retraining. This thesis embarks on a comprehensive investigation into the in-context learning capabilities of LLMs, guided by two pivotal studies: KB-BINDER's deployment in Question Answering over Knowledge Bases (KBQA) and the evaluation of LLMs' performance on LongICLBench, a self-curated benchmark for long-context understanding. \n \nThe first facet of this investigation, embodied by KB-BINDER, addresses the challenge of generalizing LLMs to diverse KBQA tasks without task-specific training. KB-BINDER pioneers a novel few-shot in-context learning approach, utilizing Codex to generate logical forms and employing BM25 for draft binding, demonstrating remarkable efficacy across heterogeneous KBQA datasets. We believe KB-BINDER can serve as an important baseline for future research in utilizing the few-shot capability of LLMs to resolve the problem of KBQA. \n \nComplementing this, the second study introduces LongICLBench, a specialized benchmark designed to test long-context LLMs in processing long, context-rich sequences across extreme-label classification tasks with in-context learning. Through evaluation with tasks of increasing difficulty level, an obvious performance threshold is identified, highlighting the current limitations of LLMs in handling extensive context windows and revealing a bias towards labels positioned towards the input's end after grouping the instances with the same labels in demonstration. This underscores a crucial gap in the current long-context LLMs' ability to reason over long sequences, paving the way for further enhancements in long-context comprehension. \n \nTogether, these studies form the cornerstone of this thesis, encapsulating the dynamic landscape of in-context learning within LLMs. Through a detailed examination of KB-BINDER and LongICLBench, this work not only charts the current capabilities and boundaries of LLMs but also lays the groundwork for future advancements in making LLMs more adaptable and proficient in handling a wide array of complex tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207