Exercícios Físicos, Aptidão Cardiopulmonar e Estado Nutricional em Militares do Segmento Feminino do Exército Brasileiro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In view of the increasing number of women who enter the Brazilian Army, this study seeks to find the profile of physical training carried out by the feminine segment, as well as the inter-relation with the nutritional state, expressed by the Index of Body Mass (IBM) and physical conditioning, expressed by the 12 minute run. The work has, as a sample, the data bank generated by “Project TAF 2001”, through the records of 1201 soldiers of the feminine segment, in the 36 largest Military Garrisons of the Brazilian Army. The body mass was measured, together with the stature of the evaluated. As well as this, the maximum consumption of oxygen (VO2max) was measured indirectly, on the basis of the Cooper test (12 minutes). Taking into consideration the duration, the frequency and the intensity, only 43.7% of the soldiers of the feminine segment carried out the sessions preconized by the C 20-20 Manual. Based on the IBM, 27.2 % presented excess weight. The majority of soldiers (54%) presented VO2max classified as reasonable or average, and 24.1% were classified as having weak or very weak aerobic potency. Hyperactivity was an important behavior factor in the development of overweight and obesity, showing physical activity as a considerable component in improving VO2max. The recommendations regarding the frequency, duration and intensity of exercise (30 to 60 minutes, 3 to 5 days a week with moderate intensity) appeared to meet the needs of the soldiers, as far as promotion of health is concerned.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".