MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009891717

GEOGRAPHIC RANGE SIZE AS A PREDICTOR OF DISPERSAL-DEPENDENT BEHAVIORAL TRAITS IN TWO CLADES OF A TERRESTRIAL SALAMANDER

2022· article· en· W7009891717 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCarroll Collected (John Carroll University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological dispersalSalamanderCladeRange (aeronautics)PhylogeographyBiogeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Animal movement has the potential to affect diverse processes within ecology and evolution including range expansion, gene flow, adaptation, and speciation. Two aspects of animal personality that are germane to dispersal are exploratory and aggressive behavior. These behavioral categories may represent a trade-off such that energy invested in territorial defense leaves little energy for movement and dispersal. The Eastern Red-backed Salamander (Plethodon cinereus) is a wide ranging, dispersal limited, terrestrial salamander with well documented phylogeographic divisions. I examined dispersal-relevant behavioral traits within two clades of P. cinereus with disparate geographic ranges. The Northern Clade (NC) has a range extending from the mid-Atlantic coast upward into Canada, across the northern reaches of the Great Lakes and south into Indiana. The Ohio Clade (OC) is largely restricted to Ohio. Previous research suggests that differences in aggression and territorial behavior exists between the clades. The OC is known to be aggressive and territorial while some evidence suggests that the NC lacks territorial behavior. I therefore predicted that members of the NC would be more exploratory and less aggressive and that members of the OC would be less exploratory and more aggressive. Salamanders from each clade were tested in two separate laboratory experiments to assess 1) aggressive behavior and 2) exploratory behavior. In experiment 1, resident salamanders of both clades spent significantly more time in the behavior Look Toward compared to control trials when no intruder was present. This response suggests that salamanders recognized intruders as potential threats. However, residency status (resident or intruder) did not influence the aggressive or submissive behavior for either clade. Additionally, in contrast to my prediction, no differences in submissive or aggressive behaviors by residents were detected between clades when intruders were present. Intruders from each clade also behaved similarly when interacting with residents. 2 In experiment 2, clade members differed in their exploratory behavior, with members of the OC being more exploratory, counter to my predictions. Specifically, members of this clade were quicker to leave their territory, and they crossed over barriers more often. I compared aggressive and exploratory behavior from experiments 1 and 2 in a correlational analysis to investigate trade-offs between these behaviors. Only in the NC was aggressive behavior “All Trunk Raised” correlated with latency to the exploratory chamber’s final zone, suggesting that, in this clade, aggressive individuals were more cautious during exploration. My results suggest that there are clear exploratory differences between the NC and OC but that these differences are not easily explained by geographic range size and historical range expansions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarroll Collected (John Carroll University)Same topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207