MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009905656

The faces of the other in Aeschylus’ «Persae»

2014· dissertation· ru· W7009905656 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)RealmPerceptionTragedy (event)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of this study is the Other at the heart of Greek tragedy.This Other is a protean figure, one with many faces, including: divinity, death, violence, madness, and monstrosity.With the help of Julia Kristeva's theorization of the abject, this thesis approaches that Other through laying out a theory of its faces.At the centre of this theory is the homosocial world, the realm of culture and its system of shared perception and signification/representation.The Other, like the abject, is beyond direct perception and thus signification.It is that which must be kept at a certain distance because it threatens to destroy the subject who confronts it as well as the system which maintains that subject in/and signification; it threatens to make the subject Other to him/herself.The project of this thesis is to explore and develop the theory of this Other through Aeschylus' Persae.Through an analysis which focuses specifically on divinity, madness, and monstrosity, all the faces of the Other are found to be both at work in this tragedy and closely related.L'objet de cette tude est la reprsentation de l'Autre dans la tragdie grecque.L'Autre est une figure inconstante avec de nombreuses facettes : le divin, la mort, la violence, la folie et la monstruosit.Avec l'aide de la thorisation de l'Abject formule par Julia Kristeva, ce mmoire approche l'Autre en dveloppant une thorie de ses diffrents visages.Le monde homosocial et le domaine de la culture ainsi que son systme de perceptions partages et de signification/reprsentation sont au centre de cette thorie.L'Autre, comme l'abject, se situe au-del de la perception directe et donc de la signification.C'est ce qui doit tre tenu distance parce que c'est ce qui menace de dtruire le sujet qui le confronte ainsi que le systme qui maintient ce sujet et/dans sa signification; ce qui menace de transformer le sujet en tant qu'Autre pour lui/elle.L'objectif de ce mmoire est d'explorer et de dvelopper la thorie de cette Autre travers les Perses d'Eschyle.Par une analyse qui se concentre particulirement sur le divin, la folie et la monstruosit, tous les visages de l'Autre s'avrent tre tous prsents dans cette tragdie et ils sont tous relis l'un l'autre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207