MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010068601

Habitat selection of the great basin spadefoot (Spea intermontana) in the grasslands of British Columbia

2009· article· en· W7010068601 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatWetlandStructural basinSelection (genetic algorithm)Site selectionGrasslandDrainage basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wetlands and their surrounding upland areas provide crucial habitat for the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana), a species at risk in the grasslands of the southern interior of British Columbia (BC), Canada. Understanding habitat selection and how these animals respond to change is crucial in the creation and implementation of conservation plans for this species. I studied the habitat selection of the Great Basin Spadefoot in the grasslands surrounding the New Gold - New Afton Mine, located approximately 10 km from Kamloops, BC. The objectives of my study were to (1) determine what type of breeding ponds spadefoots were using, (2) determine if artificial ponds could be used as a management tool, (3) determine desirable adult daytime retreat site features and decipher movement patterns to predict habitat use, and (4) determine microhabitat preferences of newly-metamorphosed spadefoots. To analyze breeding pond selection, 18 ponds on the mine site were surveyed. There was no significant difference between breeding (n=10) and non-breeding ponds (n=8) for any of the water or pond characteristics measured. Eight artificial ponds were also constructed in November 2013, and spadefoots bred in four of the eight novel ponds the following spring. Throughout the 2013 and 2014 activity seasons, radio-telemetry was used to locate daytime retreat sites and monitor movements of 33 adult animals. The maximum and mean maximum straight-line distance (m) travelled by adult spadefoots from their breeding ponds was 506 m and 240 m  146 SD. The telemetered animals relocated between retreat sites, often returning to burrows used previously. There was no significant difference, in respect to soil moisture, aspect, slope or percent ground cover, between used and available habitat plots. I also conducted a microhabitat study, within artificial enclosures, that revealed that newly-metamorphosed spadefoots preferred terrestrial habitat with moist cover. Aside from this narrow window of vulnerability, my study indicates that this species has the ability to inhabit and persist in drier, altered grassland habitats in this region through a very plastic response to a wide range of conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207