Health equity and rurality in Northern Ontario

Background: The current climate in Ontario, Canada is one where access to health and social
\nservices, healthcare experience and health/social outcomes vary widely across the province. The
\nexisting health disparities in Ontario disproportionately affect those living in rural and northern
\nareas. Current indicators used to measure this variability have been developed in the context of
\nhealth systems in more densely populated areas and may not be relevant for more rural and
\nremote geographic areas. As such, the objectives of this thesis were: (1) to develop a health
\nequity measurement approach specific to Northern Ontario based on input from Northern Ontario
\nhealth decision-makers, and (2) to operationalize a rurality measurement approach for Northern
\nOntario.
\nMethods: This two-phase exploratory sequential mixed methods study included a qualitative
\ninquiry followed by a descriptive rurality measurement. The first phase explored health equity
\nmeasurement in the context of Northern Ontario through in-depth interviews with Northern
\nOntario health equity key informants. The resulting thematic analysis informed a proposed
\nNorthern Ontario health equity measurement approach and the rurality stratifier exploration in
\nphase-two. The second phase included a descriptive analysis using secondary data. The two
\nrurality measurement approaches included were Statistical Area Classification Type and the
\nRemoteness Index. Chi -squared tests for independence were used to assess the level of
\nassociation between all classification methods including alternate categorization approaches
\nwithin the Remoteness Index measure.
\nResults: The thematic analysis in phase-one revealed four health equity indicators of relevance to
\nNorthern Ontario: infant mortality, overall mortality, perceived health status, and satisfaction of
\nhealth care received. Furthermore, two stratifiers were identified as uniquely important to
\nmeasuring health equity in Northern Ontario contexts. These two stratifiers included geographic
\nposition (rurality), as well as material welfare (income). The descriptive analysis of the rurality
\nstratifier in phase-two recommended two methods of categorization using the Remoteness Index
\nto consider as a complement or replacement to the Statistical Area Classification Type approach.
\nConclusion: This exploration of health equity measurement in the context of Northern Ontario
\nproved to be a feasible and productive way to engage key informants in health equity
\nindicator/stratifier selection and recommendation. Certain health equity stratifiers – including
\nrurality – are elusive to define and measure; however, the Statistical Area Classification Type
\nand Remoteness Index should both be considered as rurality measures in Northern Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.