Identidad grupal y comportamiento violento en la historia del racismo estadounidense
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultural diversity was defined as anything that indicated the specificity and difference of one group from another in relation to its beliefs, ways of thinking or the social characteristics of a human group.For Levis-Strauss, a culture develops through exchanges with other cultures in consideration.He considers that race is not an empirical phenomenon and asserts that there is no evidence that the distribution of genetic heritage can be related to the physical particularities known as racial.What is clear is that none human group has been isolated long enough to achieve a biologically distinct character.To understand this, we need to define some words that have a lot of importance to understand this research like multiculturalism and prejudice.Multiculturalism in the United States and Canada was developed from the 1960s onwards.The civil rights movement wanted to abolish the monocultural perspective and to be able to modify established power relations by claiming their right to exist on equal terms with the majority society that only recognised them in order to discriminate, repress and exclude them.Prejudice can be defined as a pre-judgement and a way of reacting towards people without foundation.People with prejudice towards a different group, influence the social information process and the feelings of individuals belonging to various groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it