MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010324478

Impact of foreign exchange currencies towards Malaysian stock market (Kuala Lumpur Composite Index) / Wan Mohd Nursyakirin Wan Mohd Tarmizi

2017· book· en· W7010324478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2017
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionHyporeflexiaDiafiltrationLimitingWindageFusible alloy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to investigate the impact of foreign exchange currencies towards Malaysian stock market which means Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI). This study will focus on Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (FBMKLCI) stock price movement. The factors that may influence the stock market price will be observer closely. The dependent variable for this research is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI). While the 5 independent variables that has been selected are foreign exchange rates of United States (USD), Japan (JPY), Canada (CAD), Great Britain (GBP) and European Union (EU). The data that has been taken are pooled for 10 years (January 2007 –November 2016). The data is from quarterly data from those years. Total number of observations is 38. The data was obtained from Datastream. This study used quantitative secondary data which is time series data and multiple regression model represented by the ordinary least squares (OLS). It involves the Malaysian stock price index as dependent variable and the independent variables are USD, JPY, CAD, GBP and EU. The result of this data has been revealed that only USD, JPY and EU have significant relationship with the Malaysian stock market itself while the other two variables CAD and GBP do not have significant relationship with the KLCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)Same topicFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceFrench-language works237,207