HUBUNGAN ORIENTASI TUJUAN PENCAPAIAN SOSIAL DAN KUALITAS PERSAHABATAN PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara orientasi tujuan pencapaian sosial dan kualitas persahabatan pada mahasiswa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Subjek pada penelitian ini merupakan mahasiswa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia angkatan 2018-2021 yang berusia 18 sampai 25 tahun (N=320). Jumlah sampel ditentukkan dengan menggunakan teknik quota sampling berdasarkan pada variasi jenis kelamin, fakultas, serta tahun angkatan. Instrumen yang digunakan ialah Social Achievement Goal Scales dan McGill Friendship Questionnaire–Friendship Function (MFQ-FF) dalam bentuk kuesioner yang disebarkan secara daring. Metode analisis data yang digunakan yaitu, teknik analisis korelasi Pearson dengan menggunakan software SPSS. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan antara ketiga jenis orientasi tujuan pencapaian sosial yang meliputi orientasi tujuan pengembangan sosial, orientasi tujuan pendekatan-demonstrasi sosial dan orientasi tujuan penghindaran-demonstrasi sosial dengan kualitas persahabatan pada mahasiswa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. \n \nThis study aims to determine the relationship between social achievement goal orientation and the friendship quality among students at the University of Indonesia Education. The subjects in this study were students of the Indonesian Education University class of 2018-2021 aged 18 to 25 years (N=320). The number of samples was determined using the quota sampling technique based on variations in gender, faculty, and year of class. The instruments used are the Social Achievement Goal Scales and the McGill Friendship Questionnaire–Friendship Function (MFQ-FF) in the form of a questionnaire distributed online. The data analysis method used is Pearson correlation analysis technique using SPSS software. The results show that there is a relationship between the three types of social achievement goal orientations which include social development goal orientation, social demonstration-approach goal orientation and social demonstration-avoidance goal orientation with the quality of friendship in Indonesian Education University students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".