MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010418496

Historical sea-level changes in Australia: Testing the Arctic ice melt hypothesis

2021· dissertation· en· W7010418496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingCopper alloyLiquationOverprinting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rates of regional and global sea-level rise during the 20th century were faster than in any \ncentury over the last 3000 years. Sea-level rise accelerated between ~1850 and ~1950, before \ngreenhouse gases became the dominant forcing agent, which suggests, in part, a natural \norigin. The acceleration appears to have been more rapid in the Southern Hemisphere, which, \naccording to geophysical theory, could point at a contribution from Northern Hemisphere \nland-based ice melt. More high-resolution relative sea level (RSL) reconstructions from the \nSouthern Hemisphere are needed to test this hypothesis, and to complement a limited dataset \nof proxy and tide-gauge records. This study establishes three new RSL records for \nsoutheastern Australia (covering ~1830 – 2018) from analyses of salt-marsh sediments. New \ntraining sets of contemporary salt-marsh foraminifera were used for transfer-function \nanalyses to derive palaeo sea-level estimates. High-resolution chronologies were established \nvia Accelerator Mass Spectrometry radiocarbon, radiogenic lead, stable lead isotope ratios \nand pollen analyses. The new records demonstrate that, when corrected for glacio-isostatic \nadjustment, sea level has risen by ~0.2 – 0.3 m since ~1830 in southeastern Australia. Rates of \nsea-level rise were especially high over the first half of the 20th century, with maximum \naverage rates of 4.0 (-0.4 – 7.1 95 % confidence range) mm yr-1, but there is regional variability \nbetween sites. A modelled sea-level budget indicates that the acceleration was initially driven \nby the barystatic component (including gravity, rotation and deformation), but subsequently \namplified and driven by sterodynamic sea-level change. An analysis of the sea-level \nfingerprints of the barystatic component to 20th century global sea-level rise points at a \nsignificant input from the Greenland (17 %) and Antarctic Ice Sheets (11 %) as well as glaciers \nin Alaska (14 %), the Russian Arctic (10 %), western Canada and the US (9 %), south Asia and \nsouthern Andes (8 % each).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207