HUBUNGAN ANTARA SELF-EFFICACY DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA DEWASA AWAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early adulthood is a transition period from adolescence to adulthood, in which early adult individuals are prone to experiencing a quarter life crisis because at this time individuals are faced with many demands for problems related to academic, work and career tasks, to interpersonal relationships. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between self-efficacy and the quarter life crisis. This study uses a correlational quantitative approach. Subjects in this study used an accidental sampling technique with a total of 370 subjects (106 males and 264 females) who were in early adulthood with an age range of 18 to 25 years. The research instrument used is the self-efficacy scale and the quarter life crisis scale. The data analysis technique used is Pearson Product Moment correlation. The results of the study stated that there was a negative and significant relationship between self-efficacy and quarter life crisis in early adulthood with a value (r = -0.234 and sig/p = 0.000 <0.05) which means that the higher the level of self-efficacy in individuals the lower the level of the quarter life crisis experienced, and conversely the lower the level of self-efficacy, the higher the level of the quarter life crisis experienced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".