Immunologic Studies with Moraxella Bovis in Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Billings (l889) first described a condition in Nebraska c~ttle he called keratitis contagiosa~ A short, thin bacillus .withrounded ends was isolated from the lacrimal flui.d.The organism did not.reproduce the disease when instilled :into the, conjunctiyal sac of healthy bovine eyes.Allen (1919) reported an outbreak of ,infectious keratitis in cattle in Canada.Direct smears contained a short, thick, gram negative diplobacillus..The description of the organism conforms to several of the characterisitcs described by Morax and Axenfeld (1896, 1897).Lacrimal fluid when instilled into the conjunctival sac of heal thy bovine eyes caused a disease similar to the original outbreak.Jones and Little (1923, 1924) described a diplobacillus isolated . .from.cattle in Ohio which when grown in pure culture and instilled into the conjunctival sa~ of healthy eyes caused an acute ophthalmia.Creech (1942) pointed out that. the terms, ophthalmia, conjunctivitis or ker~ti:t~~' u~ed by early investigators depend on the part of, the eye involved or the e~tent of inflannnation .The common name for all of t)lese conditions is "pink eye", or keratoconjunctivitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".