Hysteroscopic evaluation of menopausal patients with sonographically atrophic endometrium.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study objective: To assess the diagnostic and operative potential of hysteroscopy in postmenopausal patients selected by ultrasound criteria. \n \nDesign: Prospective evaluation (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). \n \nSetting: Outpatient ultrasound and hysteroscopy department of a university-affiliated hospital. \n \nPatients: Two hundred twelve women with an endometrial thickness less than 4 mm on ultrasound and in menopause for at least 1 year. \n \nInterventions: Transvaginal ultrasound and office hysteroscopy, with eye-directed biopsy specimens obtained with a 5-mm, continuous-flow operative hysteroscope, and performed without anesthesia. \n \nMeasurements and main results: Only 13 (6%) patients were symptomatic (irregular bleeding). Hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial polyps in three women (23%) was confirmed by histology. In the remaining 199 (94%) asymptomatic patients with atrophic endometrium on ultrasound, hysteroscopy showed an endometrial pathology in 10% (16 polyps, 4 submucous myomas); in one patient histologic evaluation disclosed focal adenocarcinoma in an endometrial polyp. \n \nConclusion: Hysteroscopy allows a proper histologic diagnosis, even in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with atrophic endometrium on ultrasound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".