İsmail Hakkı Bursevî’nin bestelenmiş eserleri
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Türk Din Mûsikîsi’nin en büyük güfte kaynağını Dîvan’lar oluşturmuştur. 17. \nyy. ın ikinci yarısı ve 18. yy. ın ilk çeyreğinde yaşamış olan İsmail Hakkı Bursevî’nin \nDîvân’ındaki ve kaleme almış olduğu diğer eserlerindeki şiirler, bestekârlarımız için \nönemli birer kaynak olmuştur. \nBu çalışmamızın amacı, İsmail Hakkı Bursevî ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalardan \nyararlanılarak hayatı ve eserleri hakkında bilgi vermek, kaynaklardan ulaşabildiğimiz \nşiirlerine yapılan besteleri bir araya getirip yeniden notaya alarak Türk mûsikîsinin \nhizmetine sunmaktır. \n \n-------------------- \nThe most important source of Turkish Religious Music is the Divan. 17th \ncentury. second half and 18th century. The poems of İsmail Hakkı Bursevî who lived in \nthe first quarter and in the other works of his poetry were important sources for our \ncomposers. \nThe aim of this study is to give information about İsmail Hakkı Bursevî's life \nand works by making use of the studies; to bring the compositions made to the poems \nwe can reach from the sources and to present them to the service of Turkish music.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it