MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7010677451

Impacts of restoration: assessing resource selection by reintroduced plains bison in Banff National Park and their influence on birds

2023· dissertation· en· W7010677451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational parkBison bisonSpecies richnessHabitatPopulationVegetation (pathology)BiodiversityAbundance (ecology)Forb
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parks Canada helped to restore the biodiversity of Banff National Park by reintroducing a herd of plains bison into Banff’s backcountry in 2017. Questions remain as to how bison might use the landscape and how their choice of what parts of a landscape to use might affect creatures already present there. I used remote sensing and GIS to examine how topography, the history of fire, and ecosystem type affected the odds of the Banff bison inhabiting parts of their reintroduction zone. I also used acoustic bird surveys, and vegetation structure and composition surveys to examine if changes to vegetation might influence the overall abundance and species richness of the bird population of the reintroduction zone. Bison were most likely to inhabit areas of the reintroduction zone that were on flatter terrain, closer to water, frequently burned, and that were in a grassland/shrubland ecosystem. The percent coverage of forbs increased with increasing bison usage. The percent coverage of mosses was found to increase with increasing bison usage in forests but decreased with increasing bison usage in grassland/shrublands. The overall bird population was associated with a decrease in areas most used by bison. These results show that the prescribed burn program in Banff National Park can create good habitat for bison and encourage them to explore the landscape. Burns will create critical habitat for disturbance-tolerant species and bison will help to maintain these disturbed patches. These results also show how birds sensitive to disturbance by bison may decline in the early stages of a reintroduction and that the lack of an effect on species richness may be because disturbance-tolerant birds need more time to find this new habitat. Expanding the bison reintroduction zone in the long run would be advantageous as managers work to restore bison as a force that encourages biodiversity within the Canadian Rockies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→