Interdisciplinary Master's Degree in Urban Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'he vocational concerns exp rea$ed on poge 10 of the propO$ol tire u nderstandable t n the ~<111text of c:.urror, t stude.ntootives fo r higlle.reduca tion.the propot:1ed 80urcct1 o ( s tudents, however, suggest t h a t Rtudents in the progr11m will already be employed e .g school i'Uld coll ege teach ers a nd peTsou nel in vari ou& hf:alth and ao.:lal serv ice agencies .11HJI.tho conccrtlS expressed arc 1.ntcrpreted to in-\'ol...,e a n enrich:cent of coro.pete,1cerather c:han the development: of new a nd d ifferent c:.rree't8 .'0,e propo:3ed p Tograo is. also i nterpreced not co include professional education in hLL-nan envit:on:Y1e1l(S and t;;ervlcei; plann ing aa one of lta \'OcattO'll.conce-rn"I. J l. OUALl'J',,TlVf LNl)ICl!S A, General Rationale Th~ Urban Studies n.aater of Art& propostit <:-Oflt~i ne<l heTein has been developed to pro:ide an interdisciplinary f ocus on urban studies.'l"hc my riad.comp 1ex IRSJJC.swhich ehuracter1.r.e conte.m... porary urban society demand an academic approAch which c ncouc.t.ges P.n l\f)t)re<:!o.t1on foT the dtveY$(ty or nn.:ilytfcnl apo..-onches within the social sciences as ..,ell as the ability to make USt" of speclitc research met h ods t1n<l techniqUes for the ll),1.nrisemenr. of those issues.He see the potential for contTibutiona of several k.tnds fro:11 t.h 1s ;,rograo.:::.pe<.:1(1cally.the p..-ogTanl will otternpt to pursue the fol lowin;.;:goals: a) To acquaint the studtnt "''ith the fram0-work o[ l<.nowle<l.gepertatn{n~ to the complexities oC urban society and its tnherrnL charaetcr:l,$t1cs .b) To identify present and future urban problems and their underly lng cause$.c) To develop the analyticAl tools required to anAlyzc the .Lmpact of &oc:to-econowic (.actors on L-he l nst1 tutton!'IAnd qual ity of uTb~n life.. d) 'to a.naly..:e the dev<'!lopment and role of publt.cpolicy 1n copiDR with present and future urban problems.o) To bring reisourc1ts to bear on the critical urgency of finding vi~ble solutions to existing problems and predicting possible future alternative actions.Tho expected clientele for the Urban Studies Maat~r of A'ttS Program 1'.-t:11 be draw1, fro l' ll the Rochester-Monroe Countv }letro ... poliLan area.Monroe County is a large (1970 population: 711 ,917), raptdl> grc>wiug (population growth of 21% ro1t.1960 to 1970), urban county, '..'hich foros the hub of the ilochester SMSA.l'he incren!'linp, 1.ropottance <1! Hot1,:-oe Cou,,ty 111 tC.C'III.$ of employment <.llld comoutation, is seen in the addition of Orleans.Livingaton.and Wayne counties to Monr:oe County in i963 to c.ortpt:ise the lh'>ehestc r S:-iSA, and the addition of Ontario County in 1973 to the fouT count1efl LO e<impriae the.Rtteheflr.:.er SMSA current!\~.Wittlin "lonYoe Couot)' theye :rre a nt.md)er o( groups l-1ho .areexpected to provide the ba.slc clientele.for the program: a} '!'ht-: program should ha,.ean appeal to a la rge variety of persons with a genet:al or academic intereat in urbsn 3ffairs .'I'.he&e -.ould include pitople already teaching: in area h;l.gh schools .:indoommuni.t>'C(lllege$ , ,,..,ho wish r.o (l:(:.velopurban courses and programs in t h etr schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".