Kognition bei älteren multimorbiden stationären Patienten: Einfluss auf Endpunkte bei Entlassung und dreimonatiger Nachbeobachtung
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive deficits in older multimorbid patients hospitalised for non-neuropsychiatric reasons often remain undiagnosed but are associated with poor therapy adherence and unfavourable disease trajectories. This study aimed to investigate the relationship of cognition on hospital admission with patients’ functional status and frailty at discharge, as well as mortality, hospital readmission, admission to a long-term care facility (LTCF) and falls one and three months after discharge in older hospitalised multimorbid patients. It was hypothesised that better cognition upon admission would predict better outcomes at and after discharge. One hundred and thirty-one (N = 131) older (≥ 65 years), multimorbid (≥ two chronic diseases) inpatients at Ageing Medicine Ward of the Department II of Internal Medicine at the University Hospital of Cologne underwent upon admission comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) with Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) calculation and a neuropsychological battery (Montreal Cognitive Assessment – MoCA, Trail Making Test Parts A and B – TMT-A & -B). Outcomes were functional ability (Barthel-Index – BI) and frailty/ poor prognosis (CGA-based MPI) at discharge as well as by phone collected one- and three-months post-discharge mortality, readmission to hospital, admission to LTCF, and falls. Of 131 patients, n = 121 (92.4%) showed global cognitive deficit upon admission. Of those, n = 6 cases were already known (n = 1 mild cognitive impairment – MCI, n =5 dementia), while 95% were patients with a newly identified mild or severe cognitive deficit (mCD or sCD). Patients with better performance in MoCA, TMT-A, and -B upon admission showed significantly higher functional ability at discharge (p < .001, p = .008, p = .003, respectively). MoCA (R2 = .227, p <.001) and TMT-B [OR (95% CI) = 1.006 (1.002, 1.009), p = .003] predicted BI independent of demographic factors (age, gender, education, MPI upon admission). Patients with better MoCA scores showed lower frailty at discharge (p = .005), but MoCA did not predict MPI. Neither MoCA nor TMT anticipated any of the post-discharge outcomes. In conclusion, better cognitive function upon hospital admission appears protective against functional loss at discharge in older multimorbid German inpatients. Therefore, early cognitive assessment in this population is crucial to identify patients who will develop functional deficits at discharge to ensure timely implementation of preventive strategies or individually adapted therapy schemata. Given the demographic transition and the hospitalisation rate, cognitive testing should be an integral part of the geriatric evaluation upon admission to an acute hospital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it