Least Flycatcher Range Expansion into Washington State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Least Flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) has expanded its range west over the past 50 years at least.It has occurred annually in Washington since the 1970s, and its subsequent numbers there have increased steadily.Records extend from late April to late September, with spring migration likely peaking during late May and early June and fall migration peaking during early September.Many birds appear to be seeking territories and/or mates, but as of 2004 there were only two records of nesting.No obvious habitat changes coincided with this species' arrival in Washington, and appropriate habitat seems to have long been present.The explanation for the Least Flycatcher's range expansion may be related to population increases in its core range and/or microhabitat changes not yet described.The Least Flycatcher's expansion parallels that of several other woodland birds also currently expanding west from eastern North America.The fifth edition of the A.O.U.checklist (1957) described the Least Flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) as breeding west to southwestern Yukon, northeastern British Columbia, and western Montana.By the end of the 1950s, this species had moved into portions of British Columbia where it was previously absent: the Cariboo and Chilcotin areas of the interior and the Fort Nelson area of the province's extreme northeast (Johnson 1994, Campbell et al. 1997).It colonized southern British Columbia's Okanagan Valley in the mid-and late 1970s (Cannings et al. 1987).Since 1995, Least Flycatcher sightings in Idaho have also increased dramatically, perhaps partly the result of increased observer effort and skill.Idaho recorded its sixth through eighth records as recently as the summer of 1996 (Svingen 1996), but only two years later eight were recorded during one summer (Trochlell 1998).By the summer of 2002, reports from Idaho were too many to be enumerated in North American Birds, and only new nesting locations, in five counties, were mentioned (Trochlell 2002).South of Washington, Least Flycatchers were first noted in Oregon in 1977(Mewaldt 1977) and have been found annually there during migration since 1981 (Marshall et al. 2003).Territorial birds have been noted at a number of Oregon locations, and nesting was confirmed near Mount Vernon, Grant County, in 1985, 1995, and 1997(Marshall et al. 2003).The Least Flycatcher is also annual as a migrant in California, much more frequent in fall than in spring (Small 1994), in contrast to the situation in Oregon and Washington.California has two confirmed nesting records, from Modoc County in 1984 (Campbell and LeValley 1984) and Humboldt County in 2003(Rogers et al. 2004). METHODSThis study is based on records published in North American Birds and its predecessors through fall 2004.For seasons during which records were not individually listed, I obtained the details of specific records from the journal's editors.As the Least Flycatcher is not a species reviewed by the Washington Mlodinow: Least Flycatcher Range Expansion into Washington State
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".