MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010956823

Les facteurs psychosociaux associés à l'intention de pratiquer régulièrement des activités physiques modérées chez les survivantes du cancer du sein

2021· other· fr· W7010956823 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski) · 2021
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerBreast cancerPhysical activityCoronary heart disease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ : Introduction : La pratique régulière d'activités physiques est recommandée pour les survivantes du cancer du sein afin de diminuer la fatigue liée au cancer, améliorer leur qualité de vie et diminuer le risque d'une récidive (Campbell et al., 2019). Cependant, les effets secondaires à long terme des traitements oncologiques représentent des barrières à l'adoption de saines habitudes de vie. De plus, la majorité des survivantes ne rencontrent pas les lignes directrices en matière de pratique régulière d'activités physiques (AP) modérées, soit un minimum de 150 minutes cumulées par semaine ou de 75 minutes d'intensité élevée (American Cancer Society, 2017). But : Identifier les déterminants de l'intention à pratiquer régulièrement des AP modérées chez des survivantes du cancer du sein. Méthode : Une étude corrélationnelle a été effectuée auprès de participantes (N = 136) du programme de kinésio-oncologie Ma santé Active de la Fondation cancer du sein du Québec avec un questionnaire auto-administré basé sur la théorie du comportement planifié. Résultats : Des analyses de régression multiple démontrent que l'attitude, la perception de contrôle, les croyances comportementales et celles liées au contrôle sont les déterminants de l'intention comportementale. Discussion et conclusion : Les recommandations visent le développement d'interventions ciblées sur ces déterminants pour accroître l'intention comportementale. Finalement, ce projet de recherche renseignera les professionnels de la santé sur les cibles d'intervention à préconiser pour motiver les femmes ayant un diagnostic de cancer du sein à pratiquer régulièrement des activités physiques. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en français : Intention, Théorie du comportement planifié, Déterminants, Activités physiques, Cancer du sein, Rôle infirmier en contexte de survivance. -- \nABSTRACT : Introduction: Physical activities are recommended for breast cancer survivors to decrease cancer-related fatigue, to maintain their quality of life and to decrease risk of recurrence (Campbell et al. 2019). However, the long term side effects of oncological treatments represent barriers to adopt a healthy lifestyle. Thus, the majority of survivors do not meet guidelines for regular practice of moderate physical activities, which is a minimum of 150 cumulative minutes per week or 75 minutes of vigorous intensity. (American Cancer Society, 2017) Objective: Identify the determinants of intention for breast cancer survivors to regularly engage in moderate physical activities. Methods: A correlational study was carried out among participants (N = 136) of the kinesio-oncology program My Active Health de la Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation with a self-administered questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Results: Multiple regression analysis show that attitude toward the behaviour, the perceived behavioral control, behavioral and control beliefs are the determinants of intention. Discussion & conclusion: The recommendations aim to develop targeted interventions on these determinants to increase behavioral intention. Finally, this research project will inform health professionals about the intervention targets to recommend in order to motivate women diagnosed with breast cancer to practice physical activities on a regular basis. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en anglais : Intention, Theory of planned behaviour, Predictor, Physical activity, Breast cancer, Nursing role in survival context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski)French-language works237,207