La complémentarité entre les normes de prévention et de protection en santé publique : regard sur l'éclosion de légionellose à Québec en 2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé : Quatre fonctions essentielles de santé publique ressortent de la Loi sur la santé publique, dont la prévention ainsi que la protection. Ces deux fonctions sont complémentaires en ce sens que des lacunes dans la mise en oeuvre de l’une peuvent miner la réalisation de l’autre et ainsi entraîner des conséquences sanitaires regrettables. C’est donc à la lumière de cette nécessaire complémentarité entre les fonctions de prévention et de protection, observée à travers les normes juridiques assurant leur exercice respectif, qu’un regard est porté dans le cadre de cet essai sur l’éclosion de légionellose survenue à Québec à l’été 2012. Il s’agit plus précisément de déterminer si cette éclosion a traduit un manque de complémentarité entre les normes de prévention et de protection alors en vigueur et, le cas échéant, de tenter d’en tirer des leçons pour l’avenir. // Abstract : Public health is based on four essential functions including prevention and protection. These two functions are complementary since any gap in the implementation of one function can undermine the realization of the other one and could result in negative sanitary consequences. In the light of this necessary complementarity between the functions of prevention and protection that can be observed through legal standards in place, this essay suggests an analysis of the legionellosis epidemic that occurred in Quebec City in summer 2012. The specific question is to determine if this epidemic revealed a lack of complementarity between prevention and protection standards that were in force at that time and if so, to acknowledge and learn from these events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".