MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011004443

La complémentarité entre les normes de prévention et de protection en santé publique : regard sur l'éclosion de légionellose à Québec en 2012

2015· other· fr· W7011004443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2015
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplementarity (molecular biology)Social protectionPublic policyFunction (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé : Quatre fonctions essentielles de santé publique ressortent de la Loi sur la santé publique, dont la prévention ainsi que la protection. Ces deux fonctions sont complémentaires en ce sens que des lacunes dans la mise en oeuvre de l’une peuvent miner la réalisation de l’autre et ainsi entraîner des conséquences sanitaires regrettables. C’est donc à la lumière de cette nécessaire complémentarité entre les fonctions de prévention et de protection, observée à travers les normes juridiques assurant leur exercice respectif, qu’un regard est porté dans le cadre de cet essai sur l’éclosion de légionellose survenue à Québec à l’été 2012. Il s’agit plus précisément de déterminer si cette éclosion a traduit un manque de complémentarité entre les normes de prévention et de protection alors en vigueur et, le cas échéant, de tenter d’en tirer des leçons pour l’avenir. // Abstract : Public health is based on four essential functions including prevention and protection. These two functions are complementary since any gap in the implementation of one function can undermine the realization of the other one and could result in negative sanitary consequences. In the light of this necessary complementarity between the functions of prevention and protection that can be observed through legal standards in place, this essay suggests an analysis of the legionellosis epidemic that occurred in Quebec City in summer 2012. The specific question is to determine if this epidemic revealed a lack of complementarity between prevention and protection standards that were in force at that time and if so, to acknowledge and learn from these events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)Same topicBiomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207