Letter - Ethelwyn Wetherald to Mr. & Mrs. Page, 1 January 1933
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A letter from Ethelwyn Wetherald to Mr. and Mrs. Page, 2 January 1930. The letter reads: "Dear Friends: I came very nearly calling you, Dear Arch-Schemers! For I remember so distinctly, Mr. Page, that day last summer when, after searching our bookshelves you asked if we had the poems of Dr. Drummond & I replied regretfully that we had not. I imagined you wished to verify some [illegible] from him, but now I believe you are a pair of very very generous plotters. For years I have been waiting - and intending - to get a copy of Drummond's poems: and now to have them complete from you gives this Christmas of 1929 a lasting and memorable charm. I am turning the pages with eager pleasure & thanking you both with the warmest sincerity. This holiday season has been particularly rich in Christmas cards. Nearly half a hundred to my address many from complete strangers asking where they can get my 'works'. I certainly must bring out something before this year departs. I hope Louis Blake Duff sent you as amusing a 'Christmas card' as he sent here. It is a humorous mock of his St. John farm, with very funny pictures of, & comments on, the various farm activities. With very grateful thanks for the beautiful volume you have sent me, and our best wishes to you all, including dear wee Ellen (I am in love with child) - Ever sincerely your friend Ethelwyn Wetherald"
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.532 | 0.236 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".