L'idée d'université : Anthologie des débats sur l'enseignement supérieur au Québec de 1770 à 1970
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The debate on Quebec's institutions of high learning goes back as far as the Conquest and has never ceased, for both Anglophones and Francophones. With the founding of McGill universities in 1821, and Laval in 1852, followed by other institutions of higher learning, the debate ceased to be purely theoretical. The idea of university is now evolving with its implementation. It is often those who devote their lives to it that feel the need to take stock of what has become of higher education: William Dawson, Édouard Montpetit, Marie-Victorin, Cyril James, Guy Rocher. But the central place of the university in society makes it a subject of wider debate, which concerns both the leaders of the Church, such as Bishop Bourget and Cardinal Villeneuve,\n\nIf the history of the university in Quebec remains to be written, this anthology gives at least a first sketch. It clearly shows that the very idea of ??a university has evolved according to the different currents of thought that clashed for two hundred years on the political and social scene. We pass on the reluctance of Bishop Hubert to see a young people rubbing too close to the Enlightenment, the Rioux Report who wants to integrate into the university the artistic training that previously belonged to specialized schools. We go from those like Stanley Gray who wish to put the university at the service of the Revolution, to those who want to make it an instrument of economic and regional development. If everyone agrees on the importance of the university, this agreement can not include any unanimity,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".